Image Credit: Amanda L., Plattsburgh, NY
We have wrongdoing in America right now and we have to fix it. Should our government be providing healthcare for all? Some people think that they should because people are dying all around the world because they do not have health/medical insurance. Other people think think that employers should provide health care. The government should provide healthcare because it will help with health insurance, help families in need, and it will help with giving the people of their country drugs and prescription pills.
One example of how the government helps and provides for our country is to provide health/medical insurance. Health/medical insurance is an important thing because that is how people get discounts on their health bills. It allows you go into surgery and actually receive treatment for things that you may not be able to do without health insurance. According to “Should All Americans Have the Right To Health Care” from, http://healthcare.procon.org/, “ Proponents of the right to health care say that in one of the richest nations on earth one should not go without health insurance. ” What this is saying is that our country has a lot of money and we can afford to let everyone have health insurance.
Another example of why the government should provides health care is the government can provides drugs and prescription pills to those who need them and can’t afford them. The importance of that is high because you use pills and medicine when you’re sick like the flu or a cold, or even worse; cancer, HIV, or mental health issues. From the source of,http://www.cdc.gov/, “Diabetes is a chronic medical condition that effect one and ten adults in America.” This quote means that we do have the medicine to help with that, but you can’t have that if you do not let the government in your life because they are the ones who provide health care and this falls into that category. People with diabetes often rely on insulin several times a day. This can add up to a lot of money.
The third and last example is that the government will help with families in need. This is important because what if your family members have a disease and the government can’t help with that, If they do not have the access to your medical history. From the source of, http://www.livestrong.org/, “45,000 Americans are dying because they do not have access to health care because of its cost.” This quote means that there are many people that are dying because they do not have the money for health care that is why we have Obamacare.
As we consider this abundance of evidence, it is clear that the government does improve the quality of your life by providing health care. A lot of research has been done and the facts and the evidence do not lie! It is a good idea for the government to help with things in your life. For example, my first reason, where you can save money, because the government provides health/medical insurance. Now, let’s think about if one day you broke a bone for example your arm and you needed treatment for it and when you went to the hospital imagine them saying to you “ sorry but you will have to pay full price because you have no medical insurance” Then again if you have medical insurance and they will help you and discount the cost. That is why the government should provide health care.
- Read an example of the persuasive rhetorical mode.
Universal Health Care Coverage for the United States
The United States is the only modernized Western nation that does not offer publicly funded health care to all its citizens; the costs of health care for the uninsured in the United States are prohibitive, and the practices of insurance companies are often more interested in profit margins than providing health care. These conditions are incompatible with US ideals and standards, and it is time for the US government to provide universal health care coverage for all its citizens. Like education, health care should be considered a fundamental right of all US citizens, not simply a privilege for the upper and middle classes.
One of the most common arguments against providing universal health care coverage (UHC) is that it will cost too much money. In other words, UHC would raise taxes too much. While providing health care for all US citizens would cost a lot of money for every tax-paying citizen, citizens need to examine exactly how much money it would cost, and more important, how much money is “too much” when it comes to opening up health care for all. Those who have health insurance already pay too much money, and those without coverage are charged unfathomable amounts. The cost of publicly funded health care versus the cost of current insurance premiums is unclear. In fact, some Americans, especially those in lower income brackets, could stand to pay less than their current premiums.
However, even if UHC would cost Americans a bit more money each year, we ought to reflect on what type of country we would like to live in, and what types of morals we represent if we are more willing to deny health care to others on the basis of saving a couple hundred dollars per year. In a system that privileges capitalism and rugged individualism, little room remains for compassion and love. It is time that Americans realize the amorality of US hospitals forced to turn away the sick and poor. UHC is a health care system that aligns more closely with the core values that so many Americans espouse and respect, and it is time to realize its potential.
Another common argument against UHC in the United States is that other comparable national health care systems, like that of England, France, or Canada, are bankrupt or rife with problems. UHC opponents claim that sick patients in these countries often wait in long lines or long wait lists for basic health care. Opponents also commonly accuse these systems of being unable to pay for themselves, racking up huge deficits year after year. A fair amount of truth lies in these claims, but Americans must remember to put those problems in context with the problems of the current US system as well. It is true that people often wait to see a doctor in countries with UHC, but we in the United States wait as well, and we often schedule appointments weeks in advance, only to have onerous waits in the doctor’s “waiting rooms.”
Critical and urgent care abroad is always treated urgently, much the same as it is treated in the United States. The main difference there, however, is cost. Even health insurance policy holders are not safe from the costs of health care in the United States. Each day an American acquires a form of cancer, and the only effective treatment might be considered “experimental” by an insurance company and thus is not covered. Without medical coverage, the patient must pay for the treatment out of pocket. But these costs may be so prohibitive that the patient will either opt for a less effective, but covered, treatment; opt for no treatment at all; or attempt to pay the costs of treatment and experience unimaginable financial consequences. Medical bills in these cases can easily rise into the hundreds of thousands of dollars, which is enough to force even wealthy families out of their homes and into perpetual debt. Even though each American could someday face this unfortunate situation, many still choose to take the financial risk. Instead of gambling with health and financial welfare, US citizens should press their representatives to set up UHC, where their coverage will be guaranteed and affordable.
Despite the opponents’ claims against UHC, a universal system will save lives and encourage the health of all Americans. Why has public education been so easily accepted, but not public health care? It is time for Americans to start thinking socially about health in the same ways they think about education and police services: as rights of US citizens.
This is a derivative of Writing for Success by a publisher who has requested that they and the original author not receive attribution, originally released and is used under CC BY-NC-SA. This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.